Satellite systems now underpin navigation, timing, communications, emergency response, and other critical services, yet governance frameworks for service disruption remain underdeveloped. This article examines the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 (SFDRR) as a management and planning instrument for large-scale satellite-service disruption. Using a structured qualitative documentary analysis, the paper reads the SFDRR through a transparent three-stage protocol and interprets it alongside contemporary scholarship on satellite security, disaster recovery, and critical infrastructure resilience. The analysis identifies a bounded but consequential asymmetry. The framework contains planning-relevant guidance on local preparedness, stakeholder coordination, technical and scientific capacity, public awareness, and international cooperation, all of which can support continuity planning and recovery. At the same time, its treatment of satellite risk remains indirect. The SFDRR contains no direct reference to satellites; explicit space-related terminology appears only four times, and the terms \emph{digital} and \emph{cyber} do not appear. Cross-checking the framework against contemporary disruption pathways shows that this omission materially limits its usefulness for managing global, politically contested, and technologically complex outages affecting multiple sectors simultaneously. In response, the article develops a management-oriented interpretation of the framework, clarifies the boundary conditions of that interpretation, and sets out practical planning priorities for risk mapping, redundancy design, cross-sector role allocation, and cross-border coordination. The study positions satellite disruption as a contemporary management and planning problem as much as a technical or security challenge.